Trial alternatives

Highest Court Encourages Alternatives to Trial

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin (2014 S.C.C. 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87) and encouraged alternative solutions to a trial. In her decision, Karakatsanis, J. called for “a shift in culture” (para. 20). She recognized that the adjudication of… Read more

Adding, Substituting and Removing Parties to an Action

Adding, Substituting and Removing Parties to an Action

Stewart v Stewart 2017 BCSC 1532 also dealt with Rule 6-2 (7) that deals with adding, substituting or removing parties to a court action. Rule 6-2(7)(a) provides: (7) At any stage of a proceeding, the court, on application by any person, may, subject to subrules… Read more

Reasonable Cause of Action Must Be Claimed

Reasonable Cause of Action Must Be Claimed

Stewart v Stewart 2017 BCSC 1532 discussed the law relating to the failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action in the notice of claim, which if upheld by the court  can lead to the dismissal of the claim. 52 The legal framework is well… Read more

Rambling Journal Upheld As NOT a Valid Will

Rambling Journal Upheld As NOT a Valid Will

Re Hadley Estate 2017 BCCA 311 was upheld by the Court of appeal in finding that a rambling journal was not a will that could be “cured” by S 58 WESA. This was the first appeal court decision on Section 58 WESA. Section 58 of… Read more

Independent Legal Advice Necessary

Independent Legal Advice Necessary

Bertolo v Bank of Montreal 1986 CarswellOnt 801, a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal was one the earlier cases in Canada to support the legal proposition that independent legal advice(ILA) must be present, if in this situation, a bank is to rely upon… Read more

The Proportionality Principle

The Proportionality Principle

Campoli Electric Ltd v Georgian Clairlea Inc 2017 ONSC 4898 commented on the proportionality principle that is emerging in litigation- the quest for a cultural change to best promote the most expeditious and least expensive determination of every proceeding on its merits. Disinherited.com attempts to… Read more

Amending Pleadings

Amending Pleadings

The Law regarding Amending pleadings was discussed in Director of Civil Forfeiture v Sanghera 2017 BCSC 863 where the director applied to amend the notice of claim which was opposed by the defendant. [18]         Mr. Justice Davies clearly set out the law regarding amendments and… Read more

Converting a Petition to an Action

Converting a Petition to an Action

Kent v Kent 2017 BCSC 1392 discussed converting a Petition to an Action when a court action has been commenced by a Petition and becomes mired in the litigation process, usually due to disputed facts, and requires the petition process to be converted to an… Read more

Domicile

Domicile

Sato v Sato 2017 BCSC 1394 discusses in detail the legal issue of domicile. The issue was whether the deceased was domiciled in British Columbia at the time of his marriage to the plaintiff. If so his  2011 Will was revoked by operation of law…. Read more

Appeals From Master's Orders

Appeals From Master’s Orders

In Abermin Corp. v. Granges Exploration Ltd. (1990), 45 B.C.L.R. (2d) 188, 42 C.P.C. (2d) 25 (S.C.), Mr. Justice MacDonald succinctly set out the scope of review on an appeal from a Master’s order. He said at p. 31 [C.P.C.]: An appeal from a Master’s… Read more

The Test For An Injunction

The Test for an Injunction

Grieg v Kritikopoulou 2017 ONSC 4594 sets out the Supreme Court of Canada test for the granting of an interlocutory  injunction to restrain certain activity 11 The moving party must meet the following three-part test to success on a motion seeking an interlocutory injunction: a)… Read more

Litigation Guardian: Lawyers Can Assess Mental Capacity

Litigation Guardian: Lawyers Can Assess Mental Capacity

In Gengenbacher v. Smith, 2016 BCSC 1164, the court examined what is the test that a solicitor must satisfy to determine if the solicitor can represent an individual seeking to be a litigation guardian of an adult under a legal disability and determined that the… Read more

Same Sex Partnership: The Civil Marriage Act

Same Sex Partnership

Hinks v Gallardo 20114 ONCA 494 held that a British same sex partnership was a valid spousal marriage in Ontario and presumably also in British Columbia. A Canadian and a British citizen entered into a civil partnership under the Civil Partnership Act (UK) which created… Read more

Re-Opening a Trial: New Evidence

Re-Opening a Trial: New Evidence

Lambert v Peachman 2017 ONSC 4270 outlined the law relating to what is necessary in the form of new evidence to re-open a trial. Analysis 26      The principles and authority to re-open evidence of a trial are well established and noted by the Supreme Court… Read more

Sworn Financial Disclosure

Sworn Financial Disclosure

Shinder v Shinder 2017 ONSC 4177  sets out the importance of how sworn financial disclosure in family (and estate) court actions must be honest and complete as it is a “bedrock principle” that the parties are entitled to rely upon. The Supreme Court of Canada… Read more