Secret Trust Based on Verbal Instruction of Deceased
Bergler et al v Oderthal 2019 BCSC 1882 is an example of the court finding a secret trust based on verbal instructions of the deceased
Bergler et al v Oderthal 2019 BCSC 1882 is an example of the court finding a secret trust based on verbal instructions of the deceased
Borges v Santos 2017 ONCJ 651 dismissed a claim brought against a trust alleging that the trust was a sham trust. The case involved a
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority v Moscipan 2019 BCCA 17 dealt with the proceeds of misappropriated funds from the employer of the deceased, in favor of
Mehmal v Mehmal 2018 BCSC 2057 discussed an alleged family agreement that certain siblings held property in trust for other siblings, but because the legal
Trainer v Tractorhill Sales Ltd v Teck Metals Ltd 2018 BCSC 2043 discusses the difference between a substantive constructive trust and a remedial constructive trust.
Bentley v Hansen 2018 BCSC 1844 discusses Quistclose trusts that arise by implication and where so found, create a resulting trust. Quistclose is named after
PKMB v DHL 2018 BCSC 186 provides an overview of the law of trusts, including the required presence of the “three certainties” in order to
Law Society of BC v Brito 2018 BCCA 407 held inter aiia by the BC Appeal Court that the intention to create a trust is
Gully v Gully 2018 BCSC 1590 involved in a case where a mother transferred a one half interest in her home in 2015 to her
Rebutting the presumption of a resulting trust for the gratuitous transfer of property was discussed in Wong v Huang 2012 BCSC 975 and Frischnecht v