Elder Abuse- Red Flags

Signs Your Senior Loved One is a Victim of Elder Abuse

The following article on signs of elder abuse  is reprinted with the permission of Sally Perkins , an American former home care and hospice manager.

Red Flags That Your Senior Loved One is a Victim of Elder Abuse

If only we lived in a world where people always responded to vulnerability with compassion and care. Unfortunately, elder abuse happens. Its hard to know how common it is, as researchers suspect that only about one in 14 cases ever get reported. The abuse can come at the hands of family members, hired caregivers, or from staff members in an assisted living or nursing home.

Keep in mind that many injuries and seemingly abnormal behaviors in seniors are common results of aging. Try to avoid seeing the possibility of abuse in every little behavioral change or scrape that you notice, but do be on the lookout for signs that could point to a larger issue.

Here are some of the most common symptoms that occur.

Frequent unexplained bruises

A bruise now and then is normal. You’ve probably got one somewhere on you right now and they occur more frequently in seniors due to their skin becoming thinner. If your loved one shows what seems to be an excessive amount of bruising and you have a hard time identifying a cause for them, then it’s worth starting to pay more attention.

Sprains or broken bones

As with bruising, these aren’t uncommon injuries for seniors to experience. Yet if they experience them a lot and don’t seem to have a good explanation for what happened, or seem uncomfortable providing an explanation, then you may have a bigger problem than typical aging-related clumsiness.


Cigarette burns are harder to obtain by accident and very likely point to elder abuse. Burns that appear to be caused by an iron are another serious indicator, as are burns likely caused by hot water. Â

How to Tell the Difference Between Abuse and Accidents

This is the part that’s a little trickier. Accusations of abuse are a big deal, so you don’t want to call the authorities on a family member or paid caregiver simply because your loved one is prone to falls or tends to burn themselves in the kitchen. On the other hand, of course you don’t want them to be stuck suffering abuse with no help.

There are a couple of signs that will help you gauge when injuries are intentional.

Conflicting Accounts of an Injuries Cause

If your loved one can’t seem to keep their story straight about how they got that burn, or if they seem uncomfortable providing any story or explanation at all, that could point to attempts to cover up the abuse due to fear or dependence on the abuser. Additionally, if their caregiver offers a different story than they do, that could be cause for concern.

Injuries Occurring Frequently

If every time you see your loved one they seem to have some new burn or scratch or bruise, then start paying close attention. Maybe you just have a clumsy loved one, but maybe those injuries are coming at the hands of someone else. Start to make a note of the type of injury and the date so you’ll have an easier time recognizing patterns and figuring out if it really is occurring at an abnormal rate.

Delay in Seeking Care for an Injury

Any time a senior has an accident that causes a serious injury, the first move should be to head to the hospital for care. Even for minor injuries, whoever’s around should go into problem-solving mode to help with bandaging or any other treatment needed. If injuries aren’t healing the way they should because they haven’t been properly treated, or because treatment wasn’t sought out until well after the injury first occurred, then that’s a problem.

If this happens once you should be worried and consider if there are any other signs pointing to abuse. If it happens multiple times, then it’s very likely that abuse is occurring and it’s time to step in.

What to Do if You Suspect Elder Physical Abuse

If you’re pretty sure abuse is occurring or at least have strong suspicions of it, then you need to take action.

Get your loved one somewhere safe.

If the abuser is a caregiver living in their home, then find another friend or family member’s place for them to stay. If you think it’s a staff member at a nursing home, talk to the managers there immediately. You want to make sure your loved one doesn’t continue to suffer abuse any moment longer.

Note: If your loved one has been hurt to the point where they need emergency care, your first step should be to call 911. This will ensure they get the immediate care they need and give you the opportunity to speak with the authorities and share your concerns.

Contact the proper authorities.

The National Center on Elder Abuse  ( The Public Guardian and Trustee in British Columbia)  offers a state-by-state directory of available resources you can use and agencies to report abuse to. If your loved one denies the abuse, you may be limited in how much you can do here, but it’s worth at least getting in touch with the proper authorities to see what they recommend and can do for your loved one now.

Encourage your loved one to attend therapy.

While the stigmas of therapy have faded for most people in the United States and Canada  at this point, some seniors may still find the idea unpalatable. Nonetheless, abuse can have serious negative psychological effects, especially if the abuser is someone that your loved one trusted and loved. Do your best to convince your loved one to give therapy a try to work through their feelings from the experience.

The help of a skilled professional could not only help them better handle the pain they’re feeling from the experience, but can also help them understand how to recognize abuse if it every occurs again so they don’t silently live with it.

We will probably never live in a world where physical abuse of the elderly is entirely eradicated. But if everyone does their part to pay attention and keep an eye out for the people they love, we can do a better job of identifying the problem when it does occur and taking steps to stop it.

Your loved one has lived a long life and deserves to spend their final years comfortable. Make sure no one in their life takes that away from them.

Financial Abuse of the Elderly

Financial Abuse of the Elderly


Elderly people are more susceptible to financial abuse and  fraudulent schemes such as telemarketers  and contest frauds .

Due to medical, technological and public health advances, the life span of a typical North American male or female has increased from age 68 in 1950 to approximately 80++ today and growing.

By sheer numbers alone our aging population has a greater percentage of the populace than ever.

Seniors also have an enormous amount of accumulated wealth and purchasing power that is much greater than  ever before. Nielsen rating stated  that 100 million consumers over age 50 spent $230 billion on packaged goods last year.

Con artists, scammers and other perpetrators of fraud well know this current state of affairs and are increasingly persistent and creative in the manner in which they target the “elderly”.

In 2010 20% of Americans over aged 65 admitted to having been subjected to a form of financial fraud or abuse, sometimes from their own family members.

I suspect that many others are too embarrassed to report their victimization.

Apparently one of the reasons the elderly are such targets is that they are simply more trusting than younger people despite their life experiences which one would suspect ought to lead to the opposite.

Psychologists state that this has to do with actual changes to the brain that don’t allow the elderly persons to detect the ” untrustworthy face” nearly as well as y0unger people. There is a decline in their ” gut feeling” about potential financial risks or dangers. they have a tendency to devote more of their memory and awareness to “positive” matters in general.

Seniors similarly have an increased capacity for becoming a victim of fraud due to a decline in their ability to comprehend financial decision making to the extent that one study suggests the decline is %1 for each year after age 60, despite the fact that they are seemingly not aware of any such decline.

A senior is thus more likely to become a target of  a telemarketer for example due to this deceased ability to comprehend their financial decline  when in fact it is present, perhaps even obvious   and increasing with one’s age.

There is a great need for family members to work with financial advisors to protect the interests of their aging family members.

Long time spouses who are suddenly widowed or divorced  are very vulnerable and obituaries are reviewed  by the scammers, and family members need to be aware of this.

On the other hand, much of the business conducted at disinherited.com is as a direct result of financial abuse by a family member or members.

Abusive Cargivers

when caregivers become abusive

My first realization of such a notion as a cruel caregiver was as a child watching the movie “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane” when Joan Crawford  is served a rat on a silver tray for lunch by her caregiving sister played by Bette Davis.

This article has been reproduce from The Atlantic:

Yolanda Farrell lay mostly paralyzed in a nursing home, unable to feed or dress herself, when her homeless daughter persuaded her to move out.

Linda Maureen Raye, who relatives say had been living in her car with her dog, used her mother’s Social Security to pay for a one-bedroom Riverside, California, apartment and took over as Farrell’s sole caregiver in 2010.

Over the next two years, according to police and court records, Raye took her elderly mother to the doctor once. As her mother’s health declined, Raye stopped cooperating with a nurse sent to advise her on preventing bedsores.

Yet in 2012, Raye was hired officially: She began collecting about $900 a month from taxpayers under the state’s in-home care program for poor people, according to law-enforcement authorities.

By the end of that year, Farrell, an 85-year-old former real-estate underwriter who loved to travel, had died of septic shock resulting from severe bedsore infections. Originally charged with murder, Raye, 60, pleaded guilty to elder abuse in September and was sentenced to 11 years in prison.

“She essentially neglected her to death,” said Riverside Police Detective Christian Vaughan, who investigated the case.

California’s frail elderly and disabled residents increasingly are receiving care in their own homes, an arrangement that saves the government money and offers many people a greater sense of comfort and autonomy than life in an institution. Yet caregivers are largely untrained and unsupervised, even when paid by the state, leaving thousands of residents at risk of possible abuse, neglect and poor treatment.

The move from nursing-home to in-home care is part of a massive shift across the nation, driven by cost-cutting and patient preference. In California, at least four times more elderly and disabled residents receive in-home care than live in nursing facilities—a rate that is only expected to rise as baby boomers age.

Many families either provide care for relatives without compensation or pay out of pocket for caregivers they find through word of mouth, referral agencies, or private companies. But a growing number of elderly and disabled people have incomes low enough to qualify for state-funded care under the In-Home Supportive Services program, or IHSS—the same one that paid Raye to care for her mother.

California’s $7.3 billion IHSS program is the largest publicly funded caregiver program in the nation. The caseload has more than doubled since 2001 and now serves about 490,000 low-income clients throughout the state.

Working behind closed doors for an average of about $10 an hour, these caregivers carry immense responsibility but are subject to little scrutiny, according to law-enforcement officials, elder-abuse investigators, senior-care experts, and court records. Their lapses sometimes lead to preventable injuries and death.

Many clients are too feeble or afraid to complain or ask for assistance. “We don’t know how many times Yolanda cried for help,” Detective Vaughan said. “She didn’t have a voice. She was deprived of that.”

An investigation into the IHSS program found that:

  • Training for caregivers is minimal and mostly optional. California doesn’t require training for everyone—even in CPR, first aid, or preventing injuries. By design, IHSS is not a medical program and caregivers are supposed to confine themselves to tasks such as feeding, dressing, or bathing. But some become ad-hoc nursing aides, helping to dress wounds and manage medications. The state requires caregivers receive training and authorization from physicians in these cases, but only about one in nine caregivers receives it, officials say.
  • Most clients in California, 73 percent, are related to their caregivers, up from 43 percent in 2000. The arrangements assume an inherent trust between client and caretaker—a trust that can go awry when the relationships are dysfunctional, abusive, or financially driven. While many states allow some paid family caregiving, most prohibit spouses from taking the job and some bar relatives entirely. California has no such restrictions.
  • Screening, though improved in recent years, has potentially dangerous gaps. State law requires criminal background checks and bars people from becoming caregivers if they have been convicted of certain crimes, such as elder and child abuse. But the IHSS program leaves the hiring to clients and gives them wide latitude. Felons convicted of robbery, rape, or assault can be paid caregivers if their clients get a waiver from the state. In the past four years, more than 830 people have received such waivers for caregivers convicted of serious offenses. “They can have criminal records, they can have drug addiction,” said Susan Strick, a prosecutor with the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office. “That’s a problem.”
  • Few incidents of abuse and neglect by IHSS workers are documented because authorities aren’t looking for them. County social-services workers are supposed to check on the clients once a year on the state’s behalf but are not primarily focused on the quality of care provided. Their main job is to determine whether clients are receiving the proper number of hours of care and whether their needs have changed. And because social workers are assigned hundreds of clients each, their visits are frequently brief—as short as 30 minutes a year.

Counties are also supposed to report to the state “critical incidents”—potential neglect, abuse, or self-harm requiring immediate action. But reporting practices vary widely, yielding puzzling results. In fiscal year 2012-2013, for instance, not a single critical incident was reported among the 235,000 clients in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties, the three largest in the state. That same year, smaller Sacramento County reported 1,688 incidents—accounting for most of the problems reported statewide.

“There is no evidence indicating that Sacramento County has a disproportionately higher number of critical incidents than other counties,” a Sacramento county spokeswoman said.

Beyond statistics such as these, nearly all records of IHSS are confidential. So unless a caregiver is criminally prosecuted, the details of any alleged mistreatment are unavailable to the public. Prosecutors and experts on elder abuse say only a small fraction of problems come to light. When they do, it is sometimes too late.

Neglect and abuse by paid home caregivers happens “far more regularly than we know,” said Paul Greenwood, a national expert in elder abuse and a prosecutor with the San Diego County District Attorney’s office. “We are still scratching the surface.”

Eileen Carroll, the deputy director of the California Department of Social Services, which runs IHSS, said the program “works very well for people who are capable and able to self-direct.” She acknowledged that more problems can arise when clients are older than 85, for instance, or have dementia.

In general, she said, the state tries to ensure that clients are receiving the services they need safely in their homes without compromising their independence.

The state recently has made improvements to its quality-assurance program and has clarified reporting standards for critical incidents, she said. But mandating training or increasing oversight further could fundamentally change IHSS from a program based on the consumers’ social needs to one based on their medical needs, she said.

“It’s a slippery slope,” she said. “I don’t think it is in our interest to force recipients and providers to do anything.”



The In-Home Supportive Services program has its roots in the 1950s, when a small group of polio patients was moved out of Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, a rehabilitation center in Downey, California. Officials recognized that it would be less expensive for people to be taken care of in their homes, and the March of Dimes began to pay for domestic help.

The current in-home care program, created by the California state legislature in 1973, retained the historical emphasis on supporting clients’ autonomy. The state pays the bills, but the elderly or disabled resident is the boss—responsible for hiring, firing, supervising, and training the caregiver.

To be eligible, most clients must qualify for Medi-Cal, the state insurance program for the poor, and be over 65, blind, or disabled. They also must show a need for help in the home.

Many swear by the program.

“I get to continue making choices,” said Margaret Belton, 82, who receives help seven days a week from IHSS caregivers at her Pasadena apartment. “When you go into a nursing home, you lose your ability to make decisions.”

Belton, a former nurse with arthritis, diabetes, thyroid problems, hip and knee replacements, and a history of falls, said she appreciates being able to train her own providers.

But for others, supervising a caregiver can be a struggle. That is especially true when clients are very old, severely physically or mentally impaired, or when the employees are family members with whom clients have difficult relationships.

The IHSS program can be a “perfect scenario for elder or dependent abuse,” said Julie Batz, a staff attorney at Legal Assistance for Seniors in Oakland. The clients may trust the providers because they share a history or because they assume that the government has screened and trained them, she said, but “that is not necessarily true.”

Toni Giusto, 54, said she trusted Yvonne Belanger, her domestic partner of many years, with her life. The Oakland woman hired Belanger as her IHSS caregiver in 2000, after an abscess in her neck left her paralyzed from the waist down. Giusto said she needed help with everything—eating, bathing, sitting up.

Instead, Giusto said Belanger locked her in a room. “She wouldn’t give me water or nothing,” she said. Belanger didn’t take her to the doctor, even when she developed bed sores that attracted maggots, Giusto said. Belanger sprayed bug poison on her to get rid of them, according to court papers.

Responding to a call from Giusto’s sister, police came to the house in 2010 and found Giusto with 23 open sores and an abdomen swollen from waste backed up in her bowels, according to court papers. Belanger was convicted of elder abuse and sentenced to county jail. She died last year.

“I was so trusting,” said Giusto, who now lives in a rehabilitation facility in Alameda. “I never thought she could do this to me.”

For some clients, choosing a caregiver is less about trust than about mutual need. The parents of Erica Aguirre, now 29, knew she had a drug problem. But they needed help and she needed money, so they applied to IHSS and hired her.

For about two years, Aguirre said, IHSS paid her to care for her 72-year-old mother, Guadalupe, who has asthma, diabetes, high blood pressure, and depression, and her father, Jesus, 69, who has heart problems, diabetes, and early dementia.

Guadalupe Aguirre said she and her daughter soon had arguments that ended in yelling and hitting. “I thought she was going to be different than she was,” the mother said in Spanish.

In 2012, Erica Aguirre was charged with physically and verbally abusing her mother. She was convicted and sentenced to 60 days in county jail and drug treatment, according to court documents.

In an interview at the family’s home in South Los Angeles, Erica Aguirre said she is a recovering drug addict and also suffers from depression and anxiety. Despite that, Aguirre said she followed doctors’ instructions and tried to help her parents. She said she quit working as an IHSS caregiver before her criminal case began.

“I tried my best as a caregiver,” she said. But “I wasn’t the appropriate one.”

Deborah Doctor, a legislative advocate at Disability Rights California, said there is nothing to suggest that the IHSS program fosters abuse or that people are less safe at home than they would be in an institution. The best way to ensure a high quality workforce is to pay caregivers better—not to increase regulation, she said.

“I am sure there are some bad actors but the efforts to quantify that have never come up with anything more than a minuscule perspective,” Doctor said.

* * *

Martin Hernandez, an IHSS social worker in Los Angeles County, has a tough job.

He has about 440 active cases, including people with multiple sclerosis, diabetes, mental illness, and a history of strokes. He is generally expected to visit each client once a year, though occasionally he sees someone who hasn’t been visited in two years.

Even once a year is “not enough to tell who is being harmed and who is not being harmed,” he said. “It’s very hard unless a neighbor calls or you see some kind of physical evidence.”

His colleague, Gloria Daniels, said she has an even higher caseload—493 clients. “The program is so big that it appears nobody knows what to do,” she said. “We are being told it’s quantity, not quality.”

In Los Angeles County, the most populous county in the nation, social workers have an average of 265 clients each. Under their union contract, their caseloads aren’t supposed to exceed 249. Above that, workers can’t be held to the usual disciplinary standards. But other counties have even higher ratios—in Riverside County, case workers average about 500 clients each.

There are no statewide standards for how many cases a social worker can carry. Carroll said in some smaller counties workers have caseloads as low as seven. In the areas with high caseloads, she said, the state has been urging counties to hire.

“We do want to see cases become better balanced,” she said. “We do want to see [clients] assessed every year.”

During their visits, county workers focus much more on possible fraud than on quality of care, statistics suggest. From 2008 through 2012, workers in the five most populous California counties—Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino—reported 960 cases of fraudulent overpayment to caregivers. During that same period, the workers reported a total of 32 “critical events”—potential neglect, abuse or self-harm.

The state has another limited quality-assurance program that aims to ensure clients are safe and that county workers are following proper procedures. Inspectors conduct “desk reviews” of case files and other documents, along with a very small number of home visits. In 2013, just 3.8 percent of IHSS cases were reviewed under the program.

Since last summer, more desk reviews and unannounced visits are taking place, Carroll said.

Case workers—and caregivers—are required by law to report suspected abuse or neglect. But IHSS officials and family members mostly depend on another state agency, Adult Protective Services, to investigate those concerns.

This agency is also spread thin and has limited powers, according to state records and interviews. Even if workers suspect abuse or neglect, they generally can’t remove an adult from the home without his or her permission.

“We cannot force anybody to accept our services,” said Stacey Lindberg, the program manager of Adult Protective Services in Orange County. “It is heartbreaking.”

* * *

The result, in some cases, is prolonged abuse and neglect by IHSS caregivers. Examples can be found in court records throughout the state.

In Fresno, a 26-year-old woman, disabled by a severe spine condition, hired her brother and his wife as IHSS caregivers. Police and prosecutors say the couple, Joe and Denise Roman, didn’t turn her in bed, and her tissue broke down so much that metal rods in her spine became exposed. She died and the caregivers were convicted in 2011 of abusing her.

In Lake Isabella, Kern County, Joseph McCoy was a paid caregiver over many years for his 90-year-old grandmother, who raised him. McCoy left her unattended, and officials discovered her stuck to her sheets with gruesome bedsores in a fly-infested room, according to prosecutors. She died shortly afterward. McCoy was convicted in 2012 of elder abuse.

“This was a really, really horrible case,” said Michelle Domino, the Kern County deputy district attorney. “She had clearly been left neglected for some time.”

In Yolanda Farrell’s case, relatives say they are stunned that Linda Maureen Raye even was able to become a paid caregiver for her mother. Farrell was unable to walk and had very limited use of her arms as a result of a bout with polio years earlier. Linda Maureen Raye had longstanding emotional problems, her brother Terrence Raye said. She’d tried to take care of her mother in the past but always found herself overwhelmed. “My mom would always try to believe that she was better,” he said.

Linda Maureen Raye “went behind our backs and convinced my mom that she would be better off being taken care of in a private residence with her,” Terrence Raye said. Later, he said, she told him that she needed the IHSS funds as well as Farrell’s Social Security money.

Terrence Raye said she wouldn’t allow him to visit his mom, or even talk to her, so he called police and adult-protection authorities. They interviewed Farrell in Linda Maureen Raye’s presence, he said, and told him they found nothing wrong.

The last time he saw Farrell was at Riverside Community Hospital, where she had arrived sickened from ulcers that went to the bone.

“My mom was old enough and in bad [enough] health never to recover,” he said.

One In Ten Seniors Suffer From Financial Abuse


The Vancouver Sun today reported that one in ten seniors will suffer from Elder Financial abuse, often at the hands of their closest loved ones.


“While a B.C. man was in hospital having brain surgery, his daughter was busy taking over his bank accounts and his home, thinking he wouldn’t make it.

When he got out, he had to fight to get his assets back, said Richmond MP and minister of state for seniors Alice Wong. In another case, a woman in Ontario was moved to a garage with no heat while a live-in caregiver and her family took over her house and wallet.

“These are sad stories,” Wong said to a small group of people at Multicultural Helping House Society in Vancouver Saturday. “We are facing a growing population of seniors. As that number increases so does the potential for elder abuse.”

Wong was speaking ahead of World Elder Abuse Awareness Day on Sunday, which aims to help people become more aware of what is considered a “hidden issue” that can take many forms, including physical, emotional and financial abuse. Wong announced more than $24,500 in New Horizons for Seniors Program funding to support its project entitled Breaking the Silence of Abuses: Empowering Elders.

Seniors will play a leading role in the project by helping to produce video recordings of testimonials from elderly people who have experienced abuse. They will also compile resources on elder abuse, including financial abuse, for use in awareness sessions that will encourage peer sharing, mentoring and networking.

Wong estimates four to 10 per cent of seniors face some sort of abuse, but others suggest the number is way higher. The problem is that many victims of elder abuse don’t report it. Some may be ashamed that they were bilked by scammers, while others don’t want to get their children in trouble. Some may not even realize what constitutes abuse or neglect.

In many cases, it may be a family member who continually borrows money but does not repay it, a caregiver over-medicating a senior in their care, or a contractor who over-charges for home repairs or maintenance.

“It’s been there for a long time and it’s been hidden,” said Sherry Baker, executive director of the B.C. Association of Community Response Networks. “It’s like domestic violence. What we’re doing right now is raising awareness and helping the communities to realize they have a role in this … not necessarily intervening but at least slowing it down.”

Baker noted there is no way to measure the problem because nobody has kept track or documented the cases, although this has started to be done by police and health authorities. She said while communities aren’t asked to intervene in abuse cases, neighbours who notice something amiss can help just by inviting a senior over for a cup of tea and a chat.

“It’s coming more to the fore because organizations and the government are realizing this is a health issue, a financial issue and sometimes a criminal issue,” she said. “It’s a societal issue that needs to be dealt with.”

Wong said the federal government is working on ways to penalize those who abuse seniors but the hands of police are tied because seniors are not willing to come forward.

The federal government is also working on a plan to work with banks to alert the authorities if they notice anomalies with a senior’s bank account that could be consistent with financial abuse, she added, but this will take some time because it affects privacy laws.

“Financial abuses are growing faster than physical abuses but neither is acceptable,” she said.

The provincial government, meanwhile, earlier this month launched a month-long elder abuse awareness social media campaign with the goal of educating all British Columbians on how to recognize and how to respond and take action against elder abuse and ageism. It also developed a provincial elder abuse prevention strategy in March last year that is supported by nearly $1 million in funding, and provides a foundation for better collaboration and integration to improve prevention, recognition and response services around the province.”