The Doctrine of Purchase Money Resulting Trust
In Nishi v Rascal Trucking 2013 SCC 33 , the court described the doctrine of the purchase money resulting trust as follows. At paragraphs 1
In Nishi v Rascal Trucking 2013 SCC 33 , the court described the doctrine of the purchase money resulting trust as follows. At paragraphs 1
Ryan O’Neal testifies about disputed Warhol portrait of Farrah Fawcett Love is never having to say your sorry, and that she gave me the $12
1. INTRODUCTION I always fell asleep during my law school trusts class. I could never have imagined then what an important role trusts would come
Dhaliwal v Ollek 2012 BCCA 86 discusses rebutting of the presumption of a resulting trust, and upholds that the recipient done bears the onus of
The three certainties: certainty of intention and the issue of sham trusts In order to be valid, trusts must comply with the three certainties at
One of the three requirements of a valid trust is the “certainty of the subject matter”, There are two elements to certainty of subject matter:
Trustees must not co mingle or misuse estate funds or assets for their own purposes. It is trite law that trustees are fiduciaries and must
Deceased’s Cats In Zinn v Bergen 2012 SKQB 214, the deceased left a five page typewritten will dated July 7, 2003 wherein he made several
The Requirements of a Valid Inter Vivos Transfer to a Trust The decision Mordo v Nitting 2006 BCSC 1761 is a primary source on
Alter Ego Trusts Usher v Larabee 2010 BCSC 1608 discusses the general principles of inter vivos gifts and an alter ego trust set up by